Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/1368
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Mayrapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCorazza, Pedro Henriquept_BR
dc.contributor.authorAssis Claro, Cristiane Aparecida dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Soutopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antoniopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNogueira Junior, Lafayettept_BR
dc.contributor.authorJr.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T20:51:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-11T20:51:32Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.citation.volume30pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage132-
dc.citation.epage137-
dc.identifier.doi10.15448/1980-6523.2015.4.14816pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1029460-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84973324984&doi=10.15448%2f1980-6523.2015.4.14816&partnerID=40&md5=85830dac0273c0628064e424af320edb-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/1368-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare stress transmission around implants with abutments made of three different materials using photoelastic, strain gage (SGA) and finite element (FEA) analyses. Methods: Three abutments - UCLA calcinable, cast in Ni-Cr; UCLA calcinable with a Cr-Co cervical collar, overcast with Ni-Cr; and a zirconia abutment - were installed on implants embedded in photoelastic resin. Vertical and oblique loads were applied to the abutments to the photoelastic and SGA analyses. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (a=0.05). The assembly was modeled to FEA simulation. Results: Similar fringe orders were observed in the apical region under vertical load. The greatest fringe orders were observed in the coronal region of the opposite side of load application (contralateral side) under oblique load. By SGA, no statistical difference was observed among the abutments (P=0.061) under vertical load, and no difference was found between tensile and compression sides under oblique load. FEA showed no difference in stress distribution. The oblique load generated the greatest stress values on the contralateral side in the coronal area. Conclusion: Although it was not possible to establish an agreement among the analytical methods tested, different abutment materials did not influence the transmission of stresses around implants. Copyright: © 2015 Cardoso et al.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-09-11T20:51:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2015en
dc.languageInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherEditora Universitaria da PUCRS-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Odonto Ciencia-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceScopuspt_BR
dc.subject.otherAbutment designen
dc.subject.otherBite forceen
dc.subject.otherDental implantsen
dc.subject.otherStress analysis: Tensionen
dc.titleStress distribution around implants with abutments of different materials: A comparison of photoelastic, strain gage and finite element analysesen
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.affiliationCardoso, M., Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationCorazza, P.H., Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationDe Assis Claro, C.A., University of Taubaté, Taubaté, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationBorges, A.L.S., Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationBottino, M.A., Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationNogueira, L., Jr., Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84973324984-
dc.contributor.scopus36879492800pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus55358896500pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus38060946200pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus24476133300pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus6603858894pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus24381797500pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-84973324984.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons