Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/1450
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNishioka, Gabrielapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorProchnow, Catinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFirmino, Alinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Marinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antoniopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Renata Marques dept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T20:58:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-11T20:58:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.citation.volume32pt_BR
dc.citation.spagee53-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0053pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/1450-
dc.description.abstractAbstract This in vitro study evaluated the fatigue strength of different ceramic materials indicated for monolithic restorations. Disc-shaped specimens were made according to ISO 6872 from five different ceramic materials: feldspathic ceramic (FC), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PIC), lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic (ZLS), and high translucent tetragonal zirconia polycrystals doped by yttrium (YZ-HT). After obtaining the mean of each material (n = 5) from monotonic load-to-failure tests, specimens (n = 20) were subjected to fatigue tests (staircase method) using a biaxial flexural setup (piston-on-three-balls), to determine the fatigue strength. The parameters used for fatigue tests were: 100,000 cycles at 10 Hz, initial load of ~ 60% of mean load-to-failure, and step size of 5% of the initial load (specific for each ceramic material). Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni’s test (α = 0.05) were used to analyze the fatigue strength data. Fatigue strength (MPa) of the materials was statistically different among each other as follows: YZ-HT (370.2 ± 38.7) > LD (175.2 ± 7.5) > ZLS (152.1 ± 7.5) > PIC (81.8 ± 3.9) > FC (50.8 ± 1.9). Thus, it can be concluded that, in terms of fatigue, high translucent polycrystalline zirconia is the best choice for monolithic restorations as it bears the highest load before cracking/fracturing.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-09-11T20:58:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018en
dc.languageInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO-
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Research-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceScielopt_BR
dc.subject.otherCeramicsen
dc.subject.otherComputer-Aided Designen
dc.subject.otherDental Materialsen
dc.subject.otherDental Porcelainen
dc.titleFatigue strength of several dental ceramics indicated for CAD-CAM monolithic restorationsen
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.contributor.orcidValandro, Luiz Felipe https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7203-6924pt_BR
dc.contributor.orcidProchnow, Catina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3649-8296pt_BR
dc.contributor.researcheridProchnow, Catina/S-4944-2019pt_BR
dc.contributor.researcheridValandro, Luiz Felipe/F-3171-2018pt_BR
dc.description.affiliation[AMARAL, Marina] Universidade de Taubaté, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationPROCHNOW, Catina; VALANDRO, Luiz Felipe] Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationNISHIOKA, Gabriela; FIRMINO, Aline; BOTTINO, Marco Antonio; Renata Marques de, MELO] Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brazil-
dc.subject.researchareaDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen
dc.subject.scieloareaDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen
dc.identifier.scieloSCIELO:S1806-83242018000100245-
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
S1806-83242018000100245.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons