Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/2174
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarchi A.A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGurgel M.S.C.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-12T16:32:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-12T16:32:59Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.citation.volume32pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage191-
dc.citation.epage197-
dc.identifier.issn1007203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77954667454&partnerID=40&md5=29b49cc8d3c38c06e31b2007a41aa291-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/2174-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: to assess compliance with the recommendations for opportunistic breast cancer screening by mammography. METHODS: 460 women from the town of Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil, were followed-up prospectively after the index mammography, 327 of them attended by the public health system and 133 by the private system. We evaluated the prevalence of mammography repetition, the adherence rates and predictive factors associated with the current recommendations of mammographic screening. The association of the outcomes with the independent variables was studied by obtaining the risk rates (RR) and the respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The adjusted prevalence rates were calculated by the COX regression model. RESULTS: although more than 90% of the studied women repeated the mammography at least once, the rate of correct compliance with the recommendations of mammographic screening, with repetition of the procedure every 24 months, was low (about 30% of the study sample). The preditive factors associated with compliance with mammographic screening were related to the unequal access to public or private healthcare services (RR=1.77; 95%CI=1.26-2.48) and to previous screening (RR=3.07; 95%CI=1.86-5.08). CONCLUSION: we concluded that compliance with the recommendations of opportunistic mammographic screening for breast cancer was low in both studied population segments.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-09-12T16:32:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2010en
dc.languagePortuguêspt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.sourceScopuspt_BR
dc.subject.otherBreast neoplasmsen
dc.subject.otherGuideline adherenceen
dc.subject.otherHealth plan implementationen
dc.subject.otherMammographyen
dc.subject.otherMass screeningen
dc.subject.otheradulten
dc.subject.otherarticleen
dc.subject.othercomparative studyen
dc.subject.otherfemaleen
dc.subject.otherhumanen
dc.subject.othermammographyen
dc.subject.othermass screeningen
dc.subject.othermiddle ageden
dc.subject.otherorganization and managementen
dc.subject.otherpatient complianceen
dc.subject.otherprospective studyen
dc.subject.otherstatisticsen
dc.subject.othertimeen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMammographyen
dc.subject.otherMass Screeningen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherPatient Complianceen
dc.subject.otherPrivate Sectoren
dc.subject.otherProspective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherPublic Sectoren
dc.subject.otherTime Factorsen
dc.title[DUPLICADO] Adherence to the opportunistic mammography screening in public and private health systemen
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.affiliationMarchi, A.A., Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Taubaté - UNITAU, Taubaté (SP), Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationGurgel, M.S.C., Departamento de Tocoginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas (SP), Brazil-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77954667454-
dc.contributor.scopus14625220100pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus6507790545pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.