Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/2189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Claudinei Fonsecapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPires R.C.M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMiranda D.B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVarallo A.C.T.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-12T16:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-12T16:33:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.citation.volume18pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage597-
dc.citation.epage606-
dc.identifier.issn14137895-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84892388678&partnerID=40&md5=16aaa435b959bf3eeec2392c7f1545b3-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/2189-
dc.description.abstractA tendency exists towards using indirect methods to estimate soil water content (soil moisture - θ) in the field, due to the easy of handling and agility for data acquisition. For soil moisture estimates, calibration curves are recommended for each type of soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate and calibrate FDR (Diviner2000) and TDR probes to measure moisture in two types of soil with different textures. Under laboratory conditions, variations in soil moisture determined by FDR, TDR and the standard (gravimetric) methods were compared. Values of soil moisture showed that readings using FDR method underestimated the values, and those using TDR method overestimated them when compared with those of the standard method. However, TDR values were lower to those of the standard method. Indirect methods proved to be acceptable for monitoring soil water, and the results showed that they can replace the standard method when accuracy is not essential.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-09-12T16:33:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013en
dc.languageInglêspt_BR
dc.languagePortuguêspt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofIRRIGA-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.sourceScopuspt_BR
dc.subject.otherCapacitanceen
dc.subject.otherFrequency domain reflectometryen
dc.subject.otherTime domain reflectometryen
dc.subject.otheraccuracy assessmenten
dc.subject.otherenvironmental monitoringen
dc.subject.othergravimetryen
dc.subject.othersoil moistureen
dc.subject.othersoil wateren
dc.subject.othertime domain reflectometryen
dc.subject.otherwater contenten
dc.titleCalibration of FDR and TDR probes to estimate water content in two types of soil [Calibração de sondas FDR e TDR para a estimativa da umidade em dois tipos de solo]en
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.affiliationSouza, C.F., Depto. de Recursos Naturais e Proteção Ambiental, CCA/UFSCar, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationPires, R.C.M., Centro de Ecofisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto Agronômico (IAC), Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationMiranda, D.B., Universidade de Taubaté, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationVarallo, A.C.T., Departamento de Engenharia Civil, UNITAU, Brazil-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84892388678-
dc.contributor.scopus7102769563pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus55241589600pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus56002254600pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus36129635500pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.