Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/2497
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilva C.R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJorge, Antonio Olavo Cardosopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-12T16:53:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-12T16:53:21Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.citation.volume16pt_BR
dc.citation.issue2pt_BR
dc.citation.spage107-
dc.citation.epage114-
dc.identifier.issn18068324-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036547758&partnerID=40&md5=991fbc4ea3bf581fec4291a70edbca3e-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/2497-
dc.description.abstractSurface disinfection is a procedure carried out on the external parts of the dental equipment as well as on other items of the dental office. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of 4 surface disinfectants utilized in dentistry: 77 degrees GL alcohol, phenolic compound (Duplofen), iodophor (PVP-I) and 77 degrees GL alcohol with 5% of chlorhexidine. Four surfaces of the equipment were analyzed in the study (the carter, the washbasin for hand-washing, the headrest of the chair and the external surface of the reflector), and the spray-wipe-spray procedure was carried out. From each surface, samples were collected by means of surface plates containing Mitis Salivarius bacitracin sucrose agar, Sabouraud Dextrose agar with chloramphenicol, MacConkey agar and blood agar, for counting mutans streptococci, Candida yeasts, gram-negative bacteria and total microorganisms, respectively (ufc/plate). The results were statistically analyzed by means of the Student's t test in order to compare the mean ufc/plate values. The most effective disinfectant was 77 degrees GL alcohol with 5% of chlorhexidine, mainly against gram-positive bacteria. Iodophor and phenolic compound were also effective in microbial reduction. 77 degrees GL alcohol was the least effective product - however, although it is not considered as a surface disinfectant, it produced, in this study, statistically significant microbial reduction after the disinfecting procedure.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-09-12T16:53:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2002en
dc.languagePortuguêspt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPesquisa odontológica brasileira = Brazilian oral research-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.sourceScopuspt_BR
dc.subject.otheralcoholen
dc.subject.otherchlorhexidineen
dc.subject.otherdisinfectant agenten
dc.subject.otheriodophoren
dc.subject.otherarticleen
dc.subject.otherCandidaen
dc.subject.othercross infectionen
dc.subject.otherdental equipmenten
dc.subject.otherdisinfectionen
dc.subject.othermethodologyen
dc.subject.othermicrobiologyen
dc.subject.otherStaphylococcusen
dc.subject.otherStreptococcusen
dc.subject.otherCandidaen
dc.subject.otherChlorhexidineen
dc.subject.otherCross Infectionen
dc.subject.otherDental Disinfectantsen
dc.subject.otherDental Equipmenten
dc.subject.otherDisinfectionen
dc.subject.otherEthanolen
dc.subject.otherIodophorsen
dc.subject.otherStaphylococcusen
dc.subject.otherStreptococcusen
dc.titleEvaluation of surface disinfectants utilized in dentistry [Avaliação de desinfetantes de superfície utilizados em Odontologia.]en
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.affiliationSilva, C.R., Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade de Taubaté, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliationJorge, A.O., Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade de Taubaté, Brazil-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0036547758-
dc.contributor.scopus36926143800pt_BR
dc.contributor.scopus7005222026pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.