Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/3020
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, William C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLacerda, Renata F. S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSouza-Junior, Eduardo J. C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSinhoreti, Mario A. C.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-12T16:57:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-12T16:57:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.citation.volume15pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage33-
dc.citation.epage39-
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a28173pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unitau.br/jspui/handle/20.500.11874/3020-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the Knoop hardness (KH) and the bond strength (BS) at the tooth/restoration interface of conventional methacrylate-(Filtek Supreme) and silorane-based (Filtek P90) composites photoactivated by different methods using an LED Freelight 2. Materials and Methods: Bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine by the "push-out" test in restored cavities measuring 2 x 1.5 x 2 mm with a C-factor of 2.2, prepared in 60 bovine teeth. To restore the cavities, the respective adhesive system of each composite was used (Single Bond 2 and P90 system adhesives). The composites were photoactivated by 3 different methods: continuous light: 40 s at 1000 mW/cm(2); soft-start: 10 s at 150 mW/cm(2) + 38 s at 1000 mW/cm(2); pulse delay: 5 s at 150 mW/cm(2), followed by a 3-min wait (without photoactivation) and 39 s at 1000 mW/cm(2). Before the push-out test was performed, the KH was analyzed at the top and bottom of the restorations. Data were statistically anaylzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The photoactivation methods produced no differences in BS or KH in the same composite, while Filtek P90 (28.0 MPa) showed higher BS values than Filtek Supreme (22.3 MPa) and a lower KH. Conclusion: The composite Filtek P90 was capable of increasing bond strength, but presented lower Knoop hardness.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-09-12T16:57:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013en
dc.languageInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc-
dc.publisher.countryEstados Unidospt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry-
dc.rightsEm verificaçãopt_BR
dc.sourceWeb of Sciencept_BR
dc.subject.otherResin Compositeen
dc.subject.otherPhotoactivationen
dc.subject.otherBond Strengthen
dc.subject.otherSiloraneen
dc.subject.otherMethacrylateen
dc.subject.otherTooth-Colored Postsen
dc.subject.otherDental Compositesen
dc.subject.otherContraction Stressen
dc.subject.otherShrinkage Stressen
dc.subject.otherBovine Teethen
dc.subject.otherC-Factoren
dc.subject.otherRestorationsen
dc.subject.otherSystemsen
dc.subject.otherMicroleakageen
dc.subject.otherConversionen
dc.titleEffect of Photoactivation Mode on the Hardness and Bond Strength of Methacrylate-and Silorane Monomer-based Compositesen
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.contributor.orcidSinhoreti, Mario https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-2902pt_BR
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000319167700006-
dc.description.affiliation[Brandt, William C.] Universidade de Taubaté (Unitau), Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, BR-12020330 Taubate, SP, Brazil-
dc.description.affiliation[Lacerda, Renata F. S.; Souza-Junior, Eduardo J. C.; Sinhoreti, Mario A. C.] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Dent Mat Area, Campinas, SP, Brazil-
dc.subject.wosareaDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen
dc.subject.researchareaDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineen
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.